The approach, methods, and resources used for rocket engine preliminary design and final design are usually different for each design organization and for each major type of engine. They also differ by the degree of novelty.
1. A totally new engine with new major components and some novel design concepts will result in an optimum engine design for a given application, but it is usually the most expensive and longest development approach. One of the major development costs is usually in sufficient testing of components and several engines (under various environmental and performance limit conditions), in order to establish credible reliability data with enough confidence to allow the initial flights and initial production. Since the state of the art is relatively mature today, the design and development of a truly novel engine does not happen very often.
2. New engine using major components or somewhat modified key components from proven existing engines. This is a common approach today. The design of such an engine requires working within the capability and limits of existing or slightly modified components. It requires much less testing for proving relability.
3. Uprated or improved version of an existing, proven engine. This approach is quite similar to the second. It is needed when an installed engine for a given mission requires more payload (which really means higher thrust)
and/or longer burning duration (more total impulse). Uprating often means more propellant (larger tanks), higher propellant flows and higher chamber and feed pressures, and more feed system power. The engine usually has an increased inert engine mass (thicker walls).
In a simplified way, we describe here a typical process for designing an engine. At first the basic function and requirements of the new engine must be established. These engine requirements are derived from the vehicle mission and vehicle requirements, usually determined by the customer and/or the vehicle designers, often in cooperation with one or more engine designers. The engine requirements can include key parameters such as thrust level, the desired thrust-time variation, restart or pulsing, altitude flight profile, environmental conditions, engine locations within the vehicle, and limitations or restraints on cost, engine envelope, test location, or schedule. It also includes some of the factors listed later in Table 17-5. If an existing proven engine can be adapted to these requirements, the subsequent design process will be simpler and quite different than the design of a truly new engine.
Usually some early tentative decisions about the engine are made, such as the selection of the propellants, their mixture ratio, or the cooling approach for the hot components. They are based on mission requirements, customer preferences, past experiences, some analysis, and the judgement of the key decision makers. Some additional selection decisions include the engine cycle, having one, two, or more thrust chambers fed from the same feed system, redundancy of auxiliary thrusters, or type of ignition system. Trade-off studies between several options are appropriate at this time. With a modified existing engine these parameters are well established, and require few trade-off studies or analyses. Initial analyses of the pressure balances, power distribution between pumps and turbines, gas generator flow, propellant flows and reserves, or the maximum cooling capacity are appropriate. Sketches and preliminary estimates of inert mass of key components need to be made, such as tanks, thrust chambers, turbopumps, feed and pressurization systems, thrust vector control, or support structure. Alternate arrangements of components (layouts) are usually examined, often to get the most compact configuration. An initial evaluation of combustion stability, stress analysis of critical components, water hammer, engine performance at some off-design conditions, safety features, testing requirements, cost, and schedule are often performed at this time. Participation of appropriate experts from the field of manufacturing, field service, materials, stress analysis, or safety can be critical for selecting the proper engine and the key design features. A design review is usually conducted on the selected engine design and the rationale for new or key features.
Test results of subscale or full-scale components, or related or experimental engines, will have a strong influence on this design process. The key engine selection decisions need to be validated later in the development process by testing new components and new engines.
The inert mass of the engine and other mass properties (center of gravity or moment of inertia) are key parameters of interest to the vehicle designer or customer. They are needed during preliminary design and again, in more detail, in the final design. The engine mass is usually determined by summing up the component or subsystem masses, each of which is either weighed or estimated by calculating their volumes and knowing or assuming their densities. Sometimes early estimates are based on known similar parts or subassemblies.
Preliminary engine performance estimates are often based on data from prior similar engines. If these are not available, then theoretical performance values can be calculated (see Chapter 2, 3, and 5) for F, Is, k, or 93?, using appropriate correction factors. Measured static test data are, of course, better than estimates. The final performance values are obtained from flight tests or simulated altitude tests, where airflow and altitude effects can interact with the vehicle or the plume.
If the preliminary design does not meet the engine requirements, then changes need to be made to the initial engine decisions and, if that is not sufficient, sometimes also to the mission requirements themselves. Components, pressure balances, and so forth will be reanalyzed and the results will be a modified version of the engine configuration, its inert mass, and performance. This process is iterated until the requirements are met and a suitable engine has been found. The initial design effort culminates in preliminary layouts of the engine, a preliminary inert mass estimate, an estimated engine performance, a cost estimate, and a tentative schedule. These preliminary design data form the basis for a written proposal to the customer for undertaking the final or detail design, development, testing, and for delivering engines.
Optimization studies are made to select the best engine parameters for meeting the requirements; some of them are done before a suitable engine has been identified, some afterwards. They are described further in Section 10.7. We optimize parameters such as chamber pressure, nozzle area ratio, thrust, mixture ratio, or number of large thrust chambers supplied by the same turbopump. The results of optimization studies indicate the best parameter, which will give a further, usually small, improvement in vehicle performance, propellant fraction, engine volume, or cost.
Once the engine proposal has been favorably evaluated by the vehicle designers, and after the customer has provided authorization and funding to proceed, then the final design can begin. Some of the analyses, layouts, and estimates will be repeated, but in more detail, specifications and manufacturing documents will be written, vendors will be selected, and tooling will be built. The selection of some of the key parameters (particularly those associated with some technical risk) will need to be validated. After another design review, key components and prototype engines are built and ground tested as part of a planned development effort. If proven reliable, one or two sets of engines will be installed in a vehicle and operated during flight. In those programs where a fair number of vehicles are to be built, the engine will then be produced in the required quantity.
Table 10-5 shows some of the characteristics of three different Russian designs staged combustion cycle engine designs, each at a different thrust and with different propellants (see Ref. 10-17). It shows primary engine para-
Was this article helpful?
What you need to know about… Project Management Made Easy! Project management consists of more than just a large building project and can encompass small projects as well. No matter what the size of your project, you need to have some sort of project management. How you manage your project has everything to do with its outcome.