Recommendations

Jupsat Pro Astronomy Software

Secrets of the Deep Sky

Get Instant Access

Subject to the individual limitations already summarised, any one of the three methods discussed in this chapter is capable of producing results of publishable accuracy. The first two are of particular interest to those who do not wish to buy special equipment. The ring method, although confined to very wide pairs, is ideal for the beginner who wants to attempt measurement without investing in expensive accessories. The chronometric method is more accurate, can handle closer pairs and is perhaps especially suitable for those who enjoy making their own equipment.

For all other purposes, however, the illuminated reticle eyepiece is superior. In the absence of a filar micrometer or equivalent professional apparatus, the observer intending to embark upon a serious programme of visual measurement, with a view to publishing the results, will undoubtedly find the illuminated reticle eyepiece the most practical option.

References

1 Courtot, J.-F., 1999, The Webb Society Deep-Sky Observer, 119, 4.

2 Tanguay, R., February 1999, Sky and Telescope, 116.

3 Teague, T., July 2000, Sky and Telescope, 112.

4 Harshaw, R., 2002, The Webb Society Deep-Sky Observer, 128, 1

Bibliography

Jones, K.G. and Argyle, R.W., 1986, Webb Society Deep-Sky

Observer's Handbook, vol. 1: Double Stars, 2nd edition. Martinez, P., 1994, The Observer's Guide to Astronomy, trans. Dunlop, S. chapter 13: Double and multiple stars, Cambridge University Press. Sidgwick, J.B., 1955, The Amateur Astronomer's Handbook, section 18: Micrometers, London.

Chapter 13

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Telescopes Mastery

Telescopes Mastery

Through this ebook, you are going to learn what you will need to know all about the telescopes that can provide a fun and rewarding hobby for you and your family!

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment