References

[Adams, 1979] Adams, R.M. Primitive thisness and primitive identity, The Journal of Philosophy 1979, LXXVI(1), 5-26.

[Aharonov and Bohm, 1959] Aharonov, Y., Bohm, D. Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory, Physical Review 1959, 115(3), 485-91.

[Alexander, 1956] Alexander, H.G. The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, Manchester University Press, 1956.

[Amelino-Camelia, 1999] Amelino-Camelia, G. Are we at the dawn of quantum-gravity phenomenology? Kowalski-Glikman, J., editor. Towards Quantum Gravity, Springer-Verlag, 1999. p. 1-44.

[Anderson, 1964] Anderson, J.L. Relativity principles and the role of coordinates in physics, in: Chiu, H.-Y., Hoffmann, W.F., editors. Gravitation and Relativity, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., 1964. p. 17594.

[Anderson, 1967] Anderson, J.L. Principles of Relativity Physics, New York, Academic Press, 1967.

[Armstrong, 1986] Armstrong, D.M. The nature of possibility, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1986, 16,575-94.

[Ashtekar and Rovelli, 1992] Ashtekar, A., Rovelli, C. Connections, loops, and quantum general relativity, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1992, 9, 3-12.

[Ashtekar and Stachel, 1991] Ashtekar, A., Stachel, J. Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Basel, Birkhauser, 1991.

[Ashtekar and Tate, 1996] Ashtekar, A., Tate, R. Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity, World Scientific, 1996.

[Auyang, 2001] Auyang, S.Y. Spacetime as a fundamental and inalienable structure of fields, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2001, 32(2), 205-15.

[Baez and Munian, 1994] Baez, J.C., Munian, X. Gauge Fields, Knots, and Gravity, World Scientific, 1994.

[Baez, 2001] Baez, J.C. Higher-dimensional algebra and Planck scale physics, in: Callender, C., Huggett, N., editors. Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, 2001. p. 177-95.

[Baez, 2006] Baez, J.C. Quantum quandaries: A category-theoretic perspective, in: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J., editors. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 240-65.

[Barbour and Bertotti, 1982] Barbour, J., Bertotti, B. Mach's principle and the structure of dynamical theories, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 1982,382, 295-306.

[Barbour, 1994] Barbour, J. The timelessness of quantum gravity: I. the evidence from the classical theory, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1994,11, 2853-73.

[Barbour, 2001] Barbour, J. The Discovery of Dynamics: A Study from a Machian Point of View of the Discovery and the Structure of Dynamical Theories, Oxford University Press, 2001.

[Barbour, 2003] Barbour, J. The End of Time, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003.

[Bartels, 1996] Bartels, A. Modern essentialism and the problem of individuation of spacetime points, Erkenntnis 1996, 45, 25-43.

[Beall and van Fraassen, 2003] Beall, J.C., van Fraassen, B. Possibilities and Paradoxes: An Introduction to Modal and Many-Valued Logic, Oxford University Press, 2003.

[Beig, 1994] Beig, R. The classical theory of canonical general relativity, in: Ehlers, J., Friedrich, H., editors. Canonical Gravity: From Classical to Quantum, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1994. p. 59-80.

[Belot and Earman, 1999] Belot, G., Earman, J. From metaphysics to physics, in: Butterfield, J., Pago-nis, C., editors. From Physics to Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 166-86.

[Belot and Earman, 2001] Belot, G., Earman, J. Presocratic quantum gravity, in: Callender, C., Huggett, N., editors. Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, 2001. p. 213-55.

[Belot, 1995] Belot, G. New work for counterpart theorists: Determinism, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1995,46, 185-95.

[Belot, 1996] Belot, G. Whatever is never and nowhere is not: Space, time, and ontology in classical and quantum gravity, PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1996.

[Belot, 1998] Belot, G. Understanding electromagnetism, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1998,49, 531-55.

[Belot, 2000] Belot, G. Geometry and motion, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2000, 51, 561-95.

[Belot, 2001] Belot, G. The principle of sufficient reason, The Journal of Philosophy 2001, 99, 55-74.

[Belot, 2003a] Belot, G. Notes on symmetries, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 393-412.

[Belot, 2003b] Belot, G. Symmetry and gauge freedom, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2003, 34,189-255.

[Bergmann and Komar, 1972] Bergmann, P.G., Komar, A. The coordinate group symmetries of general relativity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 1972, 5,15-28.

[Bergmann and Komar, 1980] Bergmann, P.G., Komar, A. The phase space formulation of general relativity and approaches toward its canonical quantization, in: Held, A., editor. General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years After the Birth of Albert Einstein, vol. 1, Plenum Press, 1980. p. 227-54.

[Bergmann, 1961] Bergmann, P.G. Observables in general relativity, Reviews of Modern Physics 1961, 33(4), 510-4.

[Boyd, 1984] Boyd, R. The current status of scientific realism, in: Lepin, J., editor. Scientific Realism, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1984. p. 41-82.

[Brading and Brown, 2003] Brading, K., Brown, H.R. Symmetries and Noether's theorems, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 89-109.

[Brighouse, 1994] Brighouse, C. Spacetime and holes, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 1994,1,11725.

[Brighouse, 1997] Brighouse, C. Determinism and modality, The Journal of Philosophy 1997, 48, 46581.

[Brugmann, 1994] Brugmann, B. Loop representations, in: Ehlers, J., Friedrich, H., editors. Canonical Gravity: From Classical to Quantum, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1994. p. 213-53.

[Bull and Segerberg, 1984] Bull, R., Segerberg, K. Basic modal logic, in: Gabbay, D.M., Guenthner, F., editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 2, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 1984. p. 1-88.

[Butterfield, 1984] Butterfield, J. Relationism and possible worlds, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1984,35,101-13.

[Butterfield, 1988] Butterfield, J. Albert Einstein meets David Lewis, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 1988,2, 65-81.

[Butterfield, 1989] Butterfield, J. The hole truth, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1989, 40, 1-28.

[Butterfield, 1993] Butterfield, J. Identity and interpretation in quantum theory, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1993, 24(3), 443-76.

[Butterfield, 2001] Butterfield, J. The end of time? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2001, 53, 289-330.

[Callender, 2000] Callender, C. Shedding light on time, Philosophy of Science 2000, S587-99.

[Cao, 2001] Cao, T.Y. Prerequisites for a consistent framework of quantum gravity, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2001, 32(2), 181-204.

[Cao, 2003] Cao, T.Y. Can we dissolve physical entities into mathematical structures? Synthese 2003, 136,147-68.

[Cao, 2006] Cao, T.Y. Structural realism and quantum gravity, in: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J., editors. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 40-52.

[Carlip, 1998] Carlip, S. Quantum Gravity in 2 + 1 Dimensions, Cambridge University Press, 1998.

[Castellani, 1998] Castellani, E. Galilean particles: An example of constitution of objects, in: Castel-lani, E., editor. Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, 1998. p. 181-94.

[Castellani, 2004] Castellani, E. Dirac on gauges and constraints, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 2004,43(6), 1503-14.

[Chagrov and Zakharyaschev, 1997] Chagrov, A., Zakharyaschev, M. Modal Logic, Oxford University Press, 1997.

[Chakravartty, 1998] Chakravartty, A. Semirealism, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1998,29,391-408.

[Connes and Rovelli, 1994] Connes, A., Rovelli, C. Von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time versus thermodynamics in generally covariant quantum theories, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1994,11,2899-918.

[Costa and French, 2003] Da Costa, N., French, S. Science and Partial Truth, Oxford University Press, 2003.

[Cover and O'Leary-Hawthorne, 1996] Cover, J.A., O'Leary-Hawthorne, J. Haecceitism and anti-Haecceitism in Leibniz's philosophy, Nous 1996, 30(1), 1-30.

[Crane, 1993] Crane, L. Categorical physics, http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9301061, 1993.

[Crane, 1995] Crane, L. Clocks and categories: Is quantum gravity algebraic? Journal of Mathematical Physics 1995,36, 6180-93.

[Dicke, 1964] Dicke, R.H. The many faces of Mach, in: Chiu, H.-Y., Hoffmann, W.F., editors. Gravitation and Relativity, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., 1964. p. 121-41.

[Dirac, 1958] Dirac, P.A.M. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, Oxford University Press, 1958.

[Dirac, 1964] Dirac, P.A.M. Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, Belfer Graduate School of Science Monographs Series, vol. 2, Yeshiva University, 1964.

[Dorato and Pauri, 2006] Dorato, M., Pauri, M. Holism and structuralism in classical and quantum GR, in: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J., editors. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 121-51.

[Dorato, 2000] Dorato, M. Substantivalism, relationalism, and structural spacetime realism, Foundations of Physics 2000, 30(10), 1605-28.

[Drieschner et al., 2002] Drieschner, M., Eynck, T.O., Lyre, H. Comment on redhead: The interpretation of gauge symmetry, in: Kuhlmann, M., Lyre, H., Wayne, A., editors. Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific, 2002. p. 303-12.

[Earman and Norton, 1987] Earman, J., Norton, J. What price substantivalism? The hole truth, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1987,38, 515-25.

[Earman, 1989] Earman, J. World Enough and Space-Time. Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, MIT Press, 1989.

[Earman, 2002] Earman, J. Throughly modern McTaggart: Or what McTaggart would have said if he had learned the general theory of relativity, Philosophers' Imprint 2002,2(3), 1-28.

[Earman, 2003a] Earman, J. The cosmological constant, the fate of the universe, unimodular gravity, and all that, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2003, 34(4), 559-77.

[Earman, 2003b] Earman, J. Ode to the constrained Hamiltonian formalism, in: Brading, K., Castel-lani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 140-62.

[Earman, 2006] Earman, J. Two challenges to the requirement of substantive general covariance, Synthese 2006, 148(2), 443-68.

[Eddington, 1923] Eddington, A. Mathematical Theory of Relativity, Cambridge University Press, 1923.

[Eddington, 1928] Eddington, A. The Nature of the Physical World, Cambridge University Press, 1928.

[Eddington, 1958] Eddington, A.S. The Philosophy of Physical Science, University of Michigan Press, 1958.

[Einstein, 1916] Einstein, A. The foundation of the general theory of relativity, in: Lorentz, H.A., Weyl, H., Minkowski, H., editors. The Principle of Relativity, Dover Publications, 1952. p. 111-64. 1916.

[Einstein, 1918] Einstein, A. Dialogue about objections to the theory of relativity, in: Engel, A., editor. The Berlin Years: Writings: 1918-1921, English Translation of Selected Texts. The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 7, Princeton University Press, 2002.1918.

[Esfeld, 2004] Esfeld, M. Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2004, 35(4), 601-17.

[Feynman, 1962] Feynman, R., The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol. 2, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1962.

[Field, 1980] Field, H. Science Without Numbers, Princeton University Press, 1980.

[French and Krause, 1999] French, S., Krause, D. The logic of quanta, in: Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 324-42.

[French and Ladyman, 2003] French, S., Ladyman, J. Remodeling structural realism, Synthese 2003, 136,147-68.

[French and Redhead, 1988] French, S., Redhead, M.L.G. Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1988, 39, 233-46.

[French and Rickles, 2003] French, S., Rickles, D. Understanding permutation symmetry, in: Brad-ing, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 212-38.

[French, 1989] French, S. Quantum physics and the identity of indiscernibles, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1989, 67, 432-46.

[French, 1994] French, S. Hacking away at the identity of indiscernibles: Possible worlds and Einstein's principle of equivalence, The Journal of Philosophy 1994, 92(9), 455-66.

[French, 1998] French, S. On the withering away of physical objects, in: Castellani, E., editor. Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, 1998. p. 93-113.

[French, 1999] French, S. Models and mathematics in physics: The role of group theory, in: Butter-field, J., Pagonis, C., editors. From Physics to Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 187207.

[French, 2000] French, S. Symmetry, structure, and the constitution of objects, http://philsci-archive. pitt.edu/archive/00000327/, 2000.

[French, 2001] French, S. Getting out of a hole: Identity, individuality and structuralism in space-time physics, Philosophica 2001, 67,11-29.

[French, 2003] French, S. Scribbling on the blank sheet: Eddington's structuralist conception of objects, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2003,34(2), 227-59.

[Gabbay and Guenthner, 2002] Gabbay, D.M., Guenthner, F., editors. Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Volume 2: Extensions of Classical Logic, Kluwer Academic, 2002.

[Gambini and Pullin, 1996] Gambini, R., Pullin, J. Loops, Knots, Gauge Theories, and Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[Gaul and Rovelli, 2000] Gaul, M., Rovelli, C. Loop quantum gravity and the meaning of diffeomor-phism invariance, in: Kowalski-Glikman, J., editor. Towards Quantum Gravity, Springer-Verlag, 2000. p. 277-324.

[Giulini, in press] Giulini, D. Some remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence, in: Stamatescu, I.O., editor. Approaches to Fundamental Physics: An Assessment of Current Theoretical Ideas, Springer-Verlag, in press.

[Goldblatt, 1992a] Goldblatt, R. Logics of Time and Computation, CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 7, Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1992.

[Goldblatt, 1992b] Goldblatt, R. Mathematics of Modality, CSLI Lecture Notes, vol. 43, Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1992.

[Gotay et al., 1998] Gotay, M.J., Isenberg, J., Marsden, J.E., Montgomery, R. Momentum maps and classical relativistic fields. Part I: Covariant field theory, http://www.citebase.org/ abstract?id=oai:arXiv.org:physics/9801019,1998.

[Gotay, 1984] Gotay, M. Constraints, reduction, and quantization, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1984,27(8), 2051-66.

[Govaerts, 2002] Govaerts, J. The quantum geometer's universe: Particles, interactions and topology, in: Govaerts, J., Hounkonnou, M.N., Msezane, A.Z., Msezane, A.Z., editors. Contemporary Problems in Mathematical Physics, World Scientific, 2002.

[Grünbaum, 1970] Grünbaum, A. Space, time, and falsifiability. Part I, Philosophy of Science 1970, XXXVII(4), 469-588.

[Grünbaum, 1973] Grünbaum, A. Geometrodynamics and ontology, The Journal of Philosophy 1973, LXX(21), 775-800.

[Guilini, 2003] Guilini, D. That strange procedure called quantisation, in: Giulini, D., Kiefer, C., Lammerzahl, C., editors. Quantum Gravity: From Theory to Experimental Search, Springer-Verlag, 2003. p. 17-40.

[Hacking, 1975] Hacking, I. The identity of indiscernibles, The Journal of Philosophy 1975, 72, 249-56.

[Hájicek and Kijowski, 1999] Hájicek, P., Kijowski, J. Covariant gauge fixing and Kuchar decomposition, Physical Review D 1999, 61(2), 024037.

[Hájicek, 1996] Hájicek, P. Time evolution and observables in constrained systems, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1996,13,1353-75.

[Healey, 1997] Healey, R. Nonlocality and the Aharonov-Bohm effect, Philosophy of Science 1997, 64, 18-40.

[Healey, 1999] Healey, R. Quantum analogies: A reply to maudlin, Philosophy of Science 1999, 65,183203.

[Healey, 2004] Healey, R. Gauge theory and holisms, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2004,35(4), 619-42.

[Henneaux and Teitelboim, 1992] Henneaux, M., Teitelboim, C. Quantization of Gauge Systems, Princeton University Press, 1992.

[Hoefer and Cartwright, 1993] Hoefer, C., Cartwright, N. Substantivalism and the hole argument, in: Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993.

[Hoefer, 1996] Hoefer, C. The metaphysics of space-time substantivalism, The Journal of Philosophy 1996,93,5-27.

[Hoefer, 1998] Hoefer, C. Absolute versus relational spacetime: For better or worse, the debate goes on, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1998,49,451-67.

[Horwich, 1978] Horwich, P. On the existence of time, space and space-time, Noüs 1978,12,397-419.

[Hu, 2001] Hu, S. Lecture Notes on Chern-Simons-Witten Theory, World Scientific, 2001.

[Huggett, 1994] Huggett, N. What are quanta, and why does it matter? Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 1994,2,69-76.

[Huggett, 1999] Huggett, N. Atomic metaphysics, The Journal of Philosophy 1999, 96, 5-24.

[Isham, 1992] Isham, C.J. Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time, in: Ibort, L.A., Rodriguez, M.A., editors. Integrable Systems, Quantum Groups, and Quantum Field Theories, Kluwer Academic, 1992. p. 157-288.

[Isham, 1993] Isham, C.J. Prima facie questions in quantum gravity, in: Ehlers, J., Friedrich, H., editors. Canonical Relativity: Classical and Quantum, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1993. p. 1-21.

[Ismael and van Fraassen, 2003] Ismael, J., van Fraassen, B. Symmetry as a guide to superfluous theoretical structure, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 371-92.

[Kaplan, 1975] Kaplan, D. How to Russell a Frege-Church, The Journal of Philosophy 1975, 72, 716-29.

[Kauffman, 2001] Kauffman, L., editor. Knots and Physics. 2nd edition, World Scientific, 2001.

[Krause, 1992] Krause, D. On a quasi-set theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 1992,33, 402-11.

[Kuchar, 1992] Kuchar, K. Time and interpretations of quantum gravity, in: Vincent, D.E., Williams, J.G., editors. Proceedings of the 4th Canadian Conference on General Relativity and Rel-ativistic Astrophysics, World Scientific, 1992. p. 211-314.

[Kuchar, 1993] Kuchar, K. Canonical quantum gravity, http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9304012,1993.

[Kuhn, 1970] Kuhn, T.S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1970.

[Ladyman, 1998] Ladyman, J. What is structural realism? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1998,29,409-24.

[Laudan, 1981] Laudan, L. A confutation of convergent realism, Philosophy of Science 1981,48,19-49.

[Leeds, 1999] Leeds, S. Gauges: Aharonov, Bohm, Yang, Healey, Philosophy of Science 1999,66,606-27.

[Lewis, 1975] Lewis, D.K. Counterfactuals, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1975.

[Lewis, 1983a] Lewis, D.K. Individuation by acquaintance and by stipulation, The Philosophical Review 1983, 92,3-32.

[Lewis, 1983b] Lewis, D.K. New work for a theory of universals, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 1983,61,343-77.

[Lewis, 1986a] Lewis, D.K. On The Plurality of Worlds, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986.

[Lewis, 1986b] Lewis, D.K., Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Oxford University Press, 1986.

[Loux, 1979] Loux, M., editor. The Possible and the Actual: Readings in the Metaphysics of Modality, Cornell University Press, 1979.

[Lusanna and Pauri, 2002] Lusanna, L., Pauri, M. General covariance and the objectivity of space-time point-events: The physical role of gravitational and gauge degrees of freedom, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000959/, 2002.

[Lusanna, 2003] Lusanna, L. From Einstein's hole argument to Dirac and Bergmann observables, http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0302089, 2003.

[Lusanna, 2005] Lusanna, L. The chrono-geometrical structure of special and general relativity: towards a background-independent description of the gravitational field and elementary particles, in: Reimer, A., editor. General Relativity Research Trends. Horizons in World Physics, vol. 249, Nova, 2005.

[Lyre, 2001] Lyre, H. The principles of gauging, Philosophy of Science 2001, 68, S371-81.

[Lyre, 2004] Lyre, H. Holism and structuralism in u(1) gauge theory, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2004, 35, 597-624.

[Mackey, 1978] Mackey, G.M. Unitary Group Representations in Physics, Probability, and Number Theory, Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., 1978.

[Maidens, 1993] Maidens, A. Substantivalism and the hole argument, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1993.

[Maidens, 1998] Maidens, A. Symmetry groups, absolute objects and action principles in general relativity, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 1998,29(2), 245-72.

[Marcotty and Ledgard, 1986] Marcotty, M., Ledgard, H. The World of Programming Languages, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1986.

[Marolf, 1995] Marolf, D. Almost ideal clocks in quantum cosmology: A brief derivation of time, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1995,12, 2469-86.

[Marsden and Weinstein, 1974] Marsden, J., Weinstein, A. Reduction of symplectic manifolds with symmetry, Reports in Mathematical Physics 1974, 5,121-30.

[Marsden, 1992] Marsden, J. Lectures on Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[Martin, 2003] Martin, C. On continuous symmetries and the foundations of modern physics, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 29-60.

[Matschull, 1996] Matschull, H.-J. Dirac's canonical quantization programme, http://arxiv.org/pdf/ quant-ph/9606031,1996.

[Maudlin, 1988] Maudlin, T. The essence of space-time, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 1988, 2, 82-91.

[Maudlin, 1990] Maudlin, T. Substances and space-time: What Aristotle would have said to Einstein, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 1990, 21(4), 531-61.

[Maudlin, 1993] Maudlin, T. Bucket's of water and waves of space: Why space-time is probably a substance, Philosophy of Science 1993, 60,183-203.

[Maudlin, 1998] Maudlin, T. Discussion: Healey and Aharonov-Bohm, Philosophy of Science 1998, 65, 361-8.

[Maudlin, 2002] Maudlin, T. Throughly muddled McTaggart: Or how to abuse gauge freedom to generate metaphysical monstrosities, Philosophers' Imprint 2002, 2(4), 1-19.

[McTaggart, 1908] McTaggart, J.E. The unreality of time, Mind 1908,17(68), 457-74.

[McTaggart, 1927] McTaggart, J.E., The Nature of Existence, vol. II, Cambridge University Press, 1927.

[Melia, 1999] Melia, J. Holes, haecceitism and two conceptions of determinism, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1999, 50(4), 639-64.

[Mellor, 1998] Mellor, D.H. Real Time II, Routledge, 1998.

[Misner et al., 1973] Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation, W.H. Freeman and Company, 1973.

[Montesinos et al., 1999] Montesinos, M., Rovelli, C., Thiemann, T. An SL(2, R) model of constrained systems with two Hamiltonian constraints, Physical Review D 1999, 60, 044009.

[Monton, 2006] Monton, B. Presentism and quantum gravity, in: Dieks, D., editor. The Ontology of Spacetime. Philosophy and Foundations of Physics, vol. 1, Elsevier, 2006. p. 263-80.

[Newton, 1962] Newton, I. De gravitatione, in: Hall, A., Hall, M., editors. Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, Cambridge University Press, 1962. p. 123-46.

[Norton, 1988] Norton, J. The hole argument, in: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association: Symposia and Invited Papers, vol. 2,1988. p. 56-64.

[Norton, 2003] Norton, J. General covariance, gauge theories, and the Kretschmann objections, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 110-23.

[Nounou, 2003] Nounou, A. A fourth way to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, in: Brading, K., Castel-lani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 174-99.

[Page and Wooters, 1983] Page, D.N., Wooters, W.K. Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables, Physical Review D 1983, 27, 2885-92.

[Pauri and Vallisneri, 2002] Pauri, M., Vallisneri, M. Ephemeral point-events: Is there a last remnant of physical objectivity? http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000931/, 2002.

[Plantinga, 1973] Plantinga, A. The Nature of Necessity, Oxford University Press, 1973.

[Plyuschchay and Razumov, 1995] Plyuschchay, M.S., Razumov, A.V. Dirac versus reduced phase space quantization, in: Charap, J.M., editor. Geometry of Constrained Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, 1995. p. 239-50.

[Poincare, 1905] Poincare, H. Science and Hypothesis, Dover Publications, 1905.

[Pooley, in press] Pooley, O. The Reality of Spacetime, Oxford University Press, in press.

[Quine, 1976] Quine, W.V.O. Whither physical objects? in: Cohen, R.S., Feyerabend, P.K., Wartof-sky, M.W., editors. Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1976. p. 499-502.

[Quine, 1992] Quine, W.V.O. Structure and nature, The Journal of Philosophy 1992, 89(1), 5-9.

[Redhead and Teller, 1992] Redhead, M.L.G., Teller, P. Particle labels and the theory of indistinguishable particles in quantum mechanics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1992, 42, 201-18.

[Redhead, 1975] Redhead, M.L.G. Symmetry in intertheory relations, Synthese 1975, 32, 77-112.

[Redhead, 1988] Redhead, M.L.G. A philosopher looks at quantum field theory, in: Brown, H.R., Harre, R., editors. Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Oxford University Press, 1988.

[Redhead, 1996] Redhead, M.L.G. From Physics to Metaphysics, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

[Redhead, 2003] Redhead, M.L.G. The interpretation of gauge symmetry, in: Brading, K., Castel-lani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 124-39.

[Rehren, 1990] Rehren, K.H. Quantum symmetry associated with braid group statistics, in: Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol. 370, Springer-Verlag, 1990. p. 318-39.

[Reichenbach, 1924] Reichenbach, H. The theory of motion according to Newton, Leibniz, and Huyghens, in: Reichenbach, M., editor. Modern Philosophy of Science, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1959. p. 46-66.1924.

[Reichenbach, 1947] Reichenbach, H. Elements of Symbolic Logic, London, Macmillan, 1947.

[Reichenbach, 1958] Reichenbach, H. The Philosophy of Space and Time, Dover Publications, 1958.

[Rescher and Urquhart, 1971] Rescher, N., Urquhart, A. Temporal Logic, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1971.

[Rickles, 2005] Rickles, D. A new spin on the hole argument, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 2005, 36,415-34.

[Rickles, 2006] Rickles, D. Time and structure in canonical gravity, in: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J., editors. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 152-95.

[Rovelli, 1991] Rovelli, C. Is there incompatibility between the ways time is treated in general relativity and standard quantum mechanics, in: Ashtekarn, A., Stachel, J., editors. Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Basel, Birkhäuser, 1991. p. 126-39.

[Rovelli, 1992] Rovelli, C. What is observable in classical and quantum gravity, Classical and Quantum Gravity 1992,8,297-316.

[Rovelli, 1997] Rovelli, C. Halfway through the woods: Contemporary research on space and time, in: Earman, J., Norton, J., editors. The Cosmos of Science, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1997. p. 180-223.

[Rovelli, 2000] Rovelli, C. The century of the incomplete revolution: Searching for a general relativistic quantum field theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 2000, 41(6), 3776-800.

[Rovelli, 2001] Rovelli, C. Quantum spacetime: What do we know? Callender, C., Huggett, N., editors. Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press, 2001. p. 101-22.

[Rovelli, 2002] Rovelli, C. Partial observables, Physical Review D 2002, 65,124013-8.

[Rovelli, 2004] Rovelli, C. Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University, 2004.

[Russell, 1940] Russell, B. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, New York, W.W. Norton, 1940.

[Rynasiewicz, 1994] Rynasiewicz, R. The lessons of the hole argument, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1994, XCIII, 279-306.

[Rynasiewicz, 1996] Rynasiewicz, R. Absolute versus relational space-time: An outmoded debate, The Journal of Philosophy 1996,45,407-36.

[Saunders and Brown, 1991] Saunders, S., Brown, H.R., editors. The Philosophy of Vacuum, Oxford University Press, 1991.

[Saunders, 2002] Saunders, S. How relativity contradicts presentism, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 2002, 50,277-92.

[Saunders, 2003a] Saunders, S. Indiscernibles, general covariance, and other symmetries: The case for non-reductive relationalism, in: Ashtekar, A., Cohen, R.C., Howard, D., Renn, J., Sarkar, S., Shi-mony, A., editors. Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics, Festschrift in honor of John Stachel. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 234, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic, 2003. p. 151-73.

[Saunders, 2003b] Saunders, S. Physics and Leibniz's principles, in: Brading, K., Castellani, E., editors. Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections, Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 289-307.

[Saunders, 2003c] Saunders, S. Structural realism, again, Synthese 2003,136,127-33.

[Shanmugadhasan, 1973] Shanmugadhasan, S. Canonical formalism for degenerate Lagrangians, Journal of Mathematical Physics 1973,14, 677-87.

[Shapiro, 1993] Shapiro, S. Modality and ontology, Mind 1993,102(407), 455-81.

[Shoemaker, 1969] Shoemaker, S. Time without change, The Journal of Philosophy 1969, LXVI(12), 36381.

[Singer, 1978] Singer, I.M. Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity, Communications in Mathematical Physics 1978,60, 7-12.

[Sklar, 1974] Sklar, L. Space, Time, and Spacetime, University of California Press, 1974.

[Sklar, 1985] Sklar, L. Philosophy and Spacetime Physics, University of California Press, 1985.

[Skyrms, 1981] Skyrms, B. Tractarian nominalism, Philosophical Studies 1981,40,199-206.

[Smolin, 1991] Smolin, L. Space and time in the quantum universe, in: Ashtekar, A., Stachel, J., editors. Conceptual Problems of Quantum Gravity, Basel, Birkhauser, 1991. p. 228-91.

[Smolin, 2000] Smolin, L. The present moment in quantum cosmology: Challenges to the arguments for the elimination of time, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000153/, 2000.

[Smolin, 2001] Smolin, L. Three Roads to Quantum Gravity: A New Understanding of Space, Time and the Universe, Phoenix, 2001.

[Smolin, 2006] Smolin, L. The case for background independence, in: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J., editors. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, Oxford University Press, 2006. p. 196-239.

[Smolin, in press] Smolin, L. Generic predictions of quantum theories of gravity, in: Oriti, D., editor. Approaches to Quantum Gravity—Toward a New Understanding of Space, Time, and Matter, Cambridge University Press, in press.

[Stachel, 1989] Stachel, J. Einstein's search for general covariance, 1912-1915, in: Howard, D., Stachel, J., editors. Einstein and the History of General Relativity. Einstein Studies, vol. 1, Basel, Birkhauser, 1989. p. 13-42.

[Stachel, 1993] Stachel, J. The meaning of general covariance: The hole story, in: Earman, J., Janis, A., Massey, G., editors. Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds: Essays on the Philosophy of Adolf Grünbaum, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, 1993. p. 129-60.

[Stachel, 2002] Stachel, J. 'The relations between things' and the 'things between relations': The deeper meaning of the hole argument, in: Malament, D., editor. Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics, Chicago and LaSalle, Open Court, 2002. p. 231-66.

[Stachel, 2003] Stachel, J. A brief history of space-time, in: Ciufolini, I., Dominici, D., Lusanna, L., editors. 2001: A Relativistic Spacetime Odyssey, Proceedings of the 25th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory, New Jersey, World Scientific, 2003. p. 15-34.

[Stein, 1967] Stein, H. Newtonian space-time, Texas Quarterly 1967,10,174-200.

[Stein, 1977] Stein, H. On space-time and ontology: Extract from a letter to Adolf Grünbaum, in: Earman, J., Glymour, C., Stachel, J., editors. Foundations of Space-Time Theories, University of Minnesota Press, 1977. p. 374-402.

[Stein, 1989] Stein, H. Yes, but ... : Some skeptical reflections of realism and anti-realism, Dialectica 1989,43,47-65.

[Streater and Wightman, 1964] Streater, R.F., Wightman, A.S. PCT, Spin, Statistics, and All That, New York, Benjamin, 1964.

[Teller, 1989] Teller, P. Relativity, relational holism, and the bell inequalities, in: Cushing, J.T., Mc-Mullin, E., editors. Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell's Theorem, University of Notre Dame Press, 1989. p. 208-23.

[Teller, 1990] Teller, P. What the quantum field is not, Philosophical Topics 1990,18,175-84.

[Teller, 1991] Teller, P. Substance, relations, and arguments about the nature of space-time, The Philosophical Review 1991,100(3), 363-97.

[Teller, 1998] Teller, P. Quantum mechanics and haecceities, in: Castellani, E., editor. Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, Princeton University Press, 1998. p. 114-41.

[Toretti, 1987] Torretti, R. Relativity and Geometry, Dover Publications, 1987.

[Torre, 1993] Torre, C.G. Gravitational observables and local symmetries, Physical Review D 1993, 48, R2373-6.

[Unruh, 1989] Unruh, W. Unimodular theory of canonical quantum gravity, Physical Review D 1989, 40(4), 1048-52.

[Vallentyne, 1997] Vallentyne, P. Intrinsic properties defined, Philosophical Studies 1997, 88(2), 209-19.

[van Fraassen, 1980] van Fraassen, B. The Scientific Image, Oxford University Press, 1980.

[van Fraassen, 1990] van Fraassen, B. Laws and Symmetry, Oxford University Press, 1990.

[van Fraassen, 1991] van Fraassen, B. Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View, Oxford University Press, 1991.

[van Fraassen, 2006] van Fraassen, B. Structure: Its shadow and substance, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2006, 57(2), 275-307.

[Varadarjan, 1985] Varadarjan, V.S. Geometry of Quantum Theory, 2nd edition, New York, SpringerVerlag, 1985.

[Wald, 1984] Wald, R. General Relativity, University of Chicago Press, 1984.

[Wald, 1994] Wald, R. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics, University of Chicago Press, 1994.

[Weingard, 1975] Weingard, R. On the ontological status of the metric field in general relativity, The Journal of Philosophy 1975, 72(14), 426-31.

[Weingard, 1988] Weingard, R. Virtual particles and the interpretation of quantum field theory, in: Brown, H.R., Harré, R., editors. Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory, Oxford University Press, 1988. p. 43-58.

[Weinstein, 1999] Weinstein, S. Gravity and gauge theory, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 1999, 66, S146-55.

[Weinstein, 2001] Weinstein, S. Conceptual and foundational issues in the quantization of gravity, PhD thesis, Northwestern University, 2001.

[Wheeler, 1964] Wheeler, J.A. Gravitation as geometry—II, in: Chiu, H.-Y., Hoffmann, W.F., editors. Gravitation and Relativity, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., 1964. p. 65-89.

[Wheeler, 1968] Wheeler, J.A. Superspace and the nature of quantum geometrodynamics, in: DeWitt, C.M., Wheeler, J.A., editors. Battelle Rencontres. 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics, W.A. Benjamin, Inc., 1968. p. 242-307.

[Wigner, 1967] Wigner, E. Symmetries and Reflections, Indiana University Press, 1967.

[Wilson, 1959] Wilson, N.L. Substances without substrata, Review of Metaphysics 1959,12(4), 521-39.

[Wilson, 1993] Wilson, M. There's a hole and a bucket dear Leibniz, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1993, XVIII, 202-41.

[Woodhouse, 1980] Woodhouse, N.M.J. Geometric Quantization, Oxford University Press, 1980.

[Worrall, 1989] Worrall, J. Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Papineau, D., editor. The Philosophy of Science, Oxford University Press, 1996. p. 139-65. 1989.

[York, 1971] York, J.W. Gravitational degrees of freedom and the initial value problem, Physical Review Letters 1971,26,1656-8.

This page intentionally left blank

0 0

Post a comment